‘Superman’ Review: A Fun But Flawed Intro to the DCU

Published by

on

It’s finally here, James Gunn’s Superman, or Supergunn, if you prefer. I can’t think of a recent movie that’s been talked about so much for months before its release, with both positive and negative commentary. I have to admit, I had my doubts too, after the seemingly endless release of trailers and clips, but now we get to see it in full, and the results are… a little mixed.

As far as the plot goes it’s pretty simple. Lex Luthor is a bad guy who hates Superman, thinks he’s a threat, and so arranges for him to be arrested by staging a series of incriminating events that make the Man of Steel look like he’s out to enslave Earth. With him out the way, Luthor can put his plan to gain even more power and money into effect.

That’s pretty much the entire plot, but the movie takes the long way round in telling it. It’s simply complicated, with Lex Luthor having an incredibly involved plan involving foreign wars, the Pentagon, clones, and a lot of convenience to get what he wants.

There’s a heck of a lot going on here, and it can be hard to keep track of everything that’s happening, as it flicks by so fast. Original the movie was going to be a good twenty minutes longer before a last minute recut brought the runtime down, so I wonder just what parts got cut, and whether some of these storylines got a bit more padding.

As it is, there’s a lot packed into this one movie. It’s not just about Superman, there’s also Guy Gardner, Mr. Terrific, Hawkgirl, and Metamorpho. They are all most definitely in the film, though their input is minimal and they’re more their for the plot’s sake rather than their own characters. That’s a common theme throughout the movie. It feels more like we’re in an omniscient perspective rather than down at the level of these characters. That’s partly because there’s so much “stuff” in here, that there’s never a moment to breath before you’re transported to a new location, a new character, monster or plot is introduced, or it’s time for a big fight scene.

It feels like James Gunn couldn’t quite decide what he wanted to make this movie about, so just grabbed a handful of elements from his favourite Superman comics and mashed them together into a colourful mess.

Naturally this is all overlaid with the characteristic Gunn humour. To be honest it’s not as bad as I thought. It’s all throughout, and Krypto is in far too many scenes, but it’s not the main focus, unlike his other movies. There are breaks taken to let the emotions come through, even if they’re not as common as I’d have liked.

Is this a great start to the DCU then? To be honest, I don’t think it matters all that much. It’s performance at the box office will obviously affect future decisions, but this isn’t the Iron Man of the franchise. It feels more like a single movie that can be built off from later. This isn’t an origin story for Superman, and I’m fine with that. We already saw that last time with Man of Steel, and it feels like something that’s well enough known not to have a big impact when people see the movie.

We’re already deep in the action with “Metahumans” (i.e. superheroes) having been around for years now, and the world painted in broad enough strokes that there’s room for the upcoming movies and shows to fill in the detail.

Is it a good Superman movie then? I’m not a comic reader, so I can’t judge its accuracy and can only rate it as a film, but I’d say, on the whole, yes. It’s big, loud, and filled with CGI spectacle and a wonky script. I’m surprised at the amount of times Superman gets beaten or has to rely on someone else’s help to win. I know he’s not indestructible and there have to be some stakes, but it seems to lack just that one big hero moment for the title character. Maybe this is some sort of message about “working together” or how we all need help sometime, but it would have been nice if Superman stood a little further to the front.

I don’t think this is a cinematic masterpiece that will shine as n example through the ages. It’s not groundbreaking or a marvel of filmmaking, but it has a nice “comic book-y” look to it, some genuinely impressive scenes, and a lot of action.

Despite all of its faults though, I enjoyed it. It’s fun and entertaining, and you can have a good time at the theatre and leave in a good mood, and considering a lot of entertainment today, I consider that a win.

8 responses to “‘Superman’ Review: A Fun But Flawed Intro to the DCU”

  1. Is ‘Superman’s’ Opening Weekend a Good Result for the DCU? Avatar

    […] Read my review of Superman here! […]

    Like

  2. Superhero Fatigue is Real, But What Caused It? Avatar

    […] biggest hit so far has been Superman, which opened to $220M worldwide, and is looking to finish around the $700M region, if projections […]

    Like

  3. Are Movie Characters Dumber Now? Avatar

    […] Superman is now available on digital, this is just five weeks after it premiered in theaters (apparently because you need to see it before Peacemaker S2), and still the problem of declining box office revenue stumps Hollywood. I think it’s clear that studios do this partly to get on the hype train while a movie’s still hot and being talked about, but also that they want to keep as much money for themselves as they can. It’s similar to what they did with streaming. Studios used to have big hits on networks and Netflix, but they wanted to bring it all in-house so set up their own platforms. That hasn’t worked out so well. […]

    Like

  4. Liam Neeson’s Back With a Vengeance! Avatar

    […] Gunn has announced that Man of Tomorrow, the sequel to Superman, will release in 2027… […]

    Like

  5. Paramount Buying Warner Bros. Would Be Bad for Movie Fans Avatar

    […] Superman is supposed to have made $125 million of profit, just from its theatrical release, which makes it one of the biggest hits of the year. Call me cynical, but I’m not believing that. It seems to go against all established measures for judging the success of a movie. […]

    Like

  6. Is Netflix Trying to Enter the Movie Business? Avatar

    […] bigger rush to get them onto streaming–though Warner is hardly innocent of this, having put Superman on HBO Max barely two months after its theatrical […]

    Like

  7. Has James Gunn Already Sunk the DCU? Avatar

    […] Superman has come to the end of its domestic run, with a total gross of $354M. I don’t know if it’s worth trying to argue that this movie is, at best, a middling success, as since the claim that it made $125M profit, people just seem to be running with that number. Does it actually matter, though, because I’m not sure that this DCU is off to the best of starts. […]

    Like

  8. Hollywood Needs to Make More Movie About AI Avatar

    […] Superman has failed to break even at the box office. Per Forbes, it finished its theatrical run around $40M short. I won’t get into the details of what this means for the DCU, how WB might be feeling, or what other sources of revenue there are. What I do wonder is where the figure of $125M profit came from? It seems to be so contradictory and far from the truth that I’m convinced it was James Gunn who made it up himself. […]

    Like

Leave a comment